“Elite Colleges Differ on How They Aid Poor,” an article by Richard Pérez-Peña in The New York Times on July 31st, sheds some harsh light on how hard top colleges are really trying to recruit students who come from low-income households.
“With affirmative action under attack and economic mobility feared to be stagnating,” writes Pérez-Peña, “top colleges profess a growing commitment to recruiting poor students. But a comparison of low-income enrollment shows wide disparities among the most competitive private colleges. A student at Vassar, for example, is three times as likely to receive a need-based Pell Grant as one at Washington University in St. Louis.”
Pérez-Peña uses a simple yardstick to compare different colleges’ commitment to recruiting low-income students: the percentage of all students at colleges who are receiving Pell Grants, which are typically accessed by students from families that earn less than $30,000 a year. Some might argue that this statistic doesn't reflect the subtler aspects of college recruitment, such as a college’s outreach in low-income neighborhoods, or its policies regarding affirmative action. Yet if you’re looking for a statistic that you can use to weigh whether a college is really interested in opening its doors to disadvantaged students, the percentage of Pell Grant-funded student is probably the best benchmark you can get.
Here’s a selection of statistics that Pérez-Peña cites about how many undergraduate students received Pell Grants at different colleges during the 2010-11 academic year . . .
- 22% of students at Vassar, Amherst and Emory received Pell Grants that year.
- 15% of undergraduate students at Harvard and Yale got them.
- 12% of undergraduate students at Princeton got them.
- 8% of students at Washington and Lee University got them.
- 7% of students at Washington University got them.
Note that all those schools have large endowments – among the largest of all American schools, in fact. So any thoughts that lack of money is preventing those colleges from recruiting lower-income students do not add up.
To be sure, recruiting disadvantaged students is not an easy task. Many students in inner-city areas have never heard of elite colleges. If those students have heard of those schools, they have probably assumed that they could never afford to attend.
But Richard Pérez-Peña’s article tells us that if colleges really intend to educate all promising students, it’s time to revamp recruitment practices and level the playing field.
Other Posts You Might Enjoy
Take Control of College!
College for America
StraighterLine: The Fast Track To Your Dream Degree
Why Is College so Expensive?
Applying for Scholarships Or as I like to call it, “Winning at Tuition”
Unusual Sources of Financial Aid